Exasperated Infrastructures

Exasperated Infrastructures

Share this post

Exasperated Infrastructures
Exasperated Infrastructures
Projectopalypse IV: Transportation Alternatives?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Projectopalypse IV: Transportation Alternatives?

All drivers, bus riders and cyclists are at some point pedestrians, so what's this about alternative modes?

sam sklar's avatar
sam sklar
May 19, 2020
∙ Paid

Share this post

Exasperated Infrastructures
Exasperated Infrastructures
Projectopalypse IV: Transportation Alternatives?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Projectopalyse III: ARTs & Crafts

Streets are for people first. Funding them is essential.

The smallest portion of the Federally syndicated funding goes to non-highway and non-transit projects, and states have the option to claw back any set aside further. The numbers, while large in comparison to, say, nothing at all, disappear in comparison to the yearly apportionment for surface transportation. In the worst case scenario, where states are allowed to redirect 50% of the money meant for people and bikes to programs for roads, it’s possible to claim that less than 1% of the $43 billion will go to “transportation alternatives.”

That’s it $425 million in federal funding for the entire country to build projects for pedestrians and cyclists—on average $8.5 million per state per year. Ever wonder why the city in which you live doesn’t just “fix the sidewalks?”

Forget being enough money to help redesign “active” streets, create a safe network for users of all ages and abilities, or to help kids get to school safely. Forget fo…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Exasperated Infrastructures to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 sam sklar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More